Million-dollar-plus salaries are fairly routine for CEOs and other top executives at New Jersey’s nonprofit hospitals and health care systems.
Some experts question the sustainability of these paychecks, given the Affordable Care Act’s drive to clamp down on the nation’s medical bills, but there is also the widespread view that big money draws top talent to demanding jobs that get tougher every day — as the ACA pushes hospitals to keep people healthy and out of their beds.
This issue of NJBIZ includes our inaugural “Hospital CEO Compensation” list for 2012, the most recent figures available from the annual reports that nonprofit hospitals are required to file with the IRS. The list excludes pension and deferred compensation plans that tend to create wide swings in compensation, especially as executives near retirement.
Heading up the list is Robert C. Garrett, CEO of the Hackensack University Health Network at $2.12 million, followed by Richard P. Miller, Virtua Health ($1.99 million); John K. Lloyd, Meridian Health System ($1.68 million); Barry H. Ostrowsky, Barnabas Health ($1.67 million); and Stephen K. Jones, Robert Wood Johnson Health System ($1.55 million).
Several New Jersey multi-hospital systems paid several top executives more than $1 million in 2012. Hackensack, for instance, has two executives over the million-dollar mark.
Betsy Ryan, president of the New Jersey Hospital Association, said these salaries come with the territory.
“(These executives) have highly complex jobs: They run large institutions, there is a lot at stake at those institutions, they operate 24/ 7, 365 days a year — and these folks are on the clock all the time,” she said.
Ryan said hospital compensation decisions are not made in a vacuum.
“Each institution has an executive compensation committee and each has to comport with IRS reasonableness standards,” she said. “These things are vetted.”
Ryan said New Jersey hospitals fish in a very competitive executive labor pool, wedged as we are between New York and Philadelphia.
Jeanne Otersen, policy director for the Health Professionals and Allied Employees union, whose members are nurses and other hospitals workers, has concerns about salaries.
“I think compensation ought to be fair and reasonable — and it ought to reflect the success of the hospital — and it does not appear to be that,” she said. “The system is out of whack. I don’t think we have a system that really makes sure that we are wisely spending what are scarce patient care dollars.”
She noted that these hospitals receive public funds in the form of charity care, which are subsidies the state provides to defray the cost of hospital care for the poor and uninsured, as well as revenue from the taxpayer-funded Medicare and Medicaid programs.
“They are tax-exempt institutions, and I think some of them have forgotten that,” she said.
Hackensack noted that its flagship hospital, Hackensack University Medical Center, is the largest provider of inpatient and outpatient services in the state and the largest employer in Bergen County with nearly 8,000 employees. The network has more than $1.7 billion in annual net revenue.
“The pay for HackensackUMC’s executives reflects its complexity and is consistent with those levels paid to executives in other similarly situated not-for-profit academic and integrated health systems,” Hackensack said in a statement. “The compensation philosophy is to provide market-competitive base salaries while increasing pay through pay-for-performance incentive plans based on outcomes.”
Hackensack said its trustee board “takes very seriously its commitment to provide top-quality health care to the communities served and its obligation to be good stewards of the medical center’s resources. Providing top-quality care in a fiscally and operationally sound manner in a world-class health care organization demands top leadership talent.”
HackensackUMC, the top-ranked hospital in the state, said it has “managed to be financially strong while providing more than $225 million in charity care and other community benefits in 2012 alone.”
Hackensack said its compensation committee “conducts its review and approval process in a manner that qualifies for an IRS ‘safe harbor’ (designation) — meaning the compensation is considered reasonable.”
And pay-for-performance is built in.
“In the last several years, base salaries have increased slowly as the board has shifted more of the compensation into a pay-for-performance bonus plan — based on outstanding outcomes and performance.”
Joel Cantor, director of the Center for State Health Policy at Rutgers University, said the issue of compensation is complex.
“The first responsibility of nonprofit hospital boards is to the charitable mission of their institution,” he said. “If they are authorizing excessive compensation, they are not meeting their fiduciary duty.
“On the other hand, hospital systems are large, complex organizations. Ultimately, CEO compensation is driven by the market for senior talent. There is no place to look up the right pay scale, but public scrutiny of executive compensation is appropriate and hospital boards need to take their responsibility to set executive pay at the right level seriously.”
Barnabas Health also addressed the issue in a prepared statement.
“Hospital and health system management is highly specialized due to the complexities of reimbursement, provision of clinical services and the regulatory environment,” the statement said.
“Accordingly, there are a finite number of qualified executives. These executives operate within a national pool of both nonprofit and for-profit health care providers; therefore, Barnabas Health competes with hospitals and health systems not only in New Jersey but across the nation. Moreover, insurance and private industry seeks to hire hospital executives to address their own insured or employee health care costs, creating significant additional competition.”
Barnabas said as a nonprofit system, it faces many “challenges” to attracting executives.
“We cannot offer stock options, creative equity opportunities and other for-profit industry incentives, yet at the same time, we are competing nationally with for-profit health systems and industry. Consequently, salaries of executives in nonprofits must be competitive on a national scale and we must compensate in base salaries and other models, such as a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, to compete with employers nationally for this limited group of executives.”
Barnabas said New Jersey’s high cost of living doesn’t help it compete in this national labor pool.
“Furthermore, for an executive to be successful in the health care industry, he or she needs tenure in order to make meaningful change. Once located here, the executive has substantial opportunities to move to a competitor, prompting retention-type arrangements and other selective compensation programs, which strive to keep these executives in place. While these programs add to the overall compensation, the expectation of greater success through longer tenure is of immense benefit to the community.”
David Knowlton, chief executive of the New Jersey Health Care Quality Institute, said hospital executive compensation is a “complicated” issue.
“We’ve got probably the most trying time we’ve ever had in health care, and so I guess at some level they’re worth the money if they’re going to solve the problems,” he said.
“I think the thing that is most troubling is that we’re getting compensation creep. The three most critical elements of health care reform are cost, cost and cost. So when does the escalating compensation package for CEOs become a cost element and we say, ‘This has to give some here as well?'”
Knowlton said one idea might be applying zero-based budgeting to hospital compensation, where “you start at zero and say ‘What skills set do we need, and are we paying the right amount for this service?'”