Shown is the proposed U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility at 1879 Route 46 in Roxbury Township. In the photo, at top left, is Lake Musconetcong and at top right is Lake Hopatcong. - PROVIDED BY NJ ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
DHS halts Roxbury ICE detention center construction
Shown is the proposed U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility at 1879 Route 46 in Roxbury Township. In the photo, at top left, is Lake Musconetcong and at top right is Lake Hopatcong. - PROVIDED BY NJ ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
DHS halts Roxbury ICE detention center construction
Proposed site could house more than 2,000 detainees and staff
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security agreed to temporarily halt construction and conversion work tied to a proposed Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility in Roxbury. The project will pause while the agency conducts an environmental assessment, according to a joint stipulation filed in U.S. District Court May 12.
The filing is tied to a lawsuit brought in March by New Jersey and Roxbury Township seeking to block the project. It also pauses consideration of the state’s pending motion for a preliminary injunction while DHS completes further environmental review tied to the proposed detention center.
As NJBIZ previously reported, the proposed plan would convert a vacant warehouse on Route 46 into what officials say could become the largest immigrant detention facility in New Jersey. It would house more than 2,000 detainees and staff.
Local backlash
State and local leaders have argued the site lacks sufficient water and sewer infrastructure, would worsen traffic and emergency service demands, and could create environmental risks tied to the nearby Highlands region and Lake Hopatcong watershed.
Officials also contend the project would remove a potentially productive industrial property from economic use.
According to the filing, DHS agreed not to undertake construction or conversion activities tied to transforming the warehouse into a detention center until it completes a final environmental assessment and related agency decision documents. Limited site security and maintenance activities are still permitted during that period.
The stipulation further states that if New Jersey renews its motion for a preliminary injunction following the environmental review, DHS would remain restricted from moving forward with conversion activities for an additional 30 days after that filing.
‘Back off’
In a joint statement issued May 12, Gov. Mikie Sherrill, Attorney General Jennifer Davenport and Roxbury Mayor Shawn Potillo said they have consistently argued that DHS’s plan would harm the surrounding community and fail to improve public safety.
State and local officials argue the proposed U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility in Roxbury Township (at top) would harm the surrounding community and fail to improve public safety. – PROVIDED BY NJ ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE
“Since we filed litigation, we’ve been demanding the federal government back off its rushed construction and operation of an immigration detention center in Roxbury,” the officials said in the statement.
“We’ve been clear from the beginning that DHS’s proposed ICE detention facility in Roxbury will harm the community and won’t do anything to make us safer,” the statement continued. “If DHS conducts a proper analysis, it will discover that this industrial warehouse is no place for a detention center. If DHS continues to plow ahead after conducting its further analysis, we will return to Court to seek relief immediately.”
We’ve been clear from the beginning that DHS’s proposed ICE detention facility in Roxbury will harm the community and won’t do anything to make us safer.
– Elected NJ officials, joint statement
State and local officials previously alleged DHS and ICE violated multiple federal laws by failing to consult with state and local leaders or conduct a proper environmental review before advancing the project. Officials also said DHS purchased the property for $129 million – roughly double its assessed value – and criticized what they described as a rushed effort to convert a warehouse never designed for detention use.
DHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
This website uses cookies, web beacons, pixels, tags, software development kits, and related tracking technologies, as described in our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy, for purposes that may include website operation, analytics, analyzing site usage, enhancing site navigation optimizing a user's experience, and third-party advertising or marketing purposes. Through these technologies, we and certain third parties may automatically collect information about your interactions with our website, such as your browsing behavior and page views. We also may share this information about your activity on our website with our social media, advertising, analytics, and other business partners. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of these technologies and that we can share information about your activity on our website with third parties in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. If you do not agree with our use of non-essential tracking technologies, please click “Reject All.” You may opt out of certain non-essential technologies by clicking “Cookie Settings.”
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Advertisement
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.